In this article, we will explore the challenges of managing permissions, the risks associated with improper access controls, and how major cloud providers handle permissions. We’ll also take a look at best practices and advanced solutions like cloud infrastructure entitlement management (CIEM).
Wiz Experts Team
6 minutes read
What are effective permissions?
Effective permissions are the actual security permissions that a user, group, or service account has on a given resource within a cloud environment. Understanding effective permission settings is crucial for ensuring access controls align with security policies and the principle of least privilege.
Controlling security permissions matters more now than ever. Recent reports indicate that 61% of organizations faced cloud security issues in 2024, underscoring the importance of implementing effective security measures to protect sensitive data and maintain regulatory compliance. Right-sized permissions are a key component in a robust security posture because they prevent unauthorized access. Misconfigured or excessive permissions can lead to serious risks, such as data breaches and compliance violations.
In this article, we will explore the challenges of managing permissions, the risks associated with improper access controls, and how major cloud providers handle permissions. We’ll also take a look at best practices and advanced solutions like cloud infrastructure entitlement management (CIEM). Let’s dive in.
The challenges of effective permissions in the cloud
As we’ve seen, effective permissions define the access rights of users and systems, preventing unauthorized access to sensitive data—or unintentionally granting it. Misconfigured or excessive permissions can lead to serious risks, such as data breaches and compliance violations. Yet controlling permissions is not as straightforward as it seems. Here are some common obstacles:
Complexities introduced by cloud-native services and APIs
Cloud-native services and APIs introduce complexities such as dynamic permissions that change based on usage, intricate microservices architectures requiring varied access levels, and the management of numerous service accounts. Fine-grained access controls can lead to misconfigurations, while API security necessitates specific types of permissions across gateways.
Additionally, event-driven architectures demand real-time permissions adjustments, and evolving compliance requirements further complicate access management. The rapid deployment of resources and inter-service dependencies increase the challenge of maintaining clear and secure permissions structures.
Let’s consider an example of workloads running on a Kubernetes cluster along with the cloud providers' roles and permissions. In this scenario, the permutations and combinations ratchet up the complexity of properly managing various types of permissions. Often, this leads to developers giving more powerful permissions than required to avoid issues and move faster with development.
Multi-cloud environments
Managing permissions in multi-cloud environments is challenging due to diverse permissions models, inconsistent policies, and complex inheritance structures. Each provider's unique system complicates the enforcement of consistent access controls and the principle of least privilege. Furthermore, increased vulnerabilities, visibility challenges, and varying compliance requirements necessitate sophisticated native tools and strategies for effective management.
Overly permissive or misconfigured access rights
Overly permissive or misconfigured access rights pose significant risks, including data breaches, insider threats, and compliance violations. They can increase the attack surface, lead to resource misuse, and complicate accountability and incident recovery. Another complication could be unintended access across services, exposing sensitive information.
Common scenarios affecting effective permissions
Role assumption and temporary credentials
Role assumption and temporary credentials influence effective permissions by providing dynamic, scoped access that enhances flexibility and enforces the principle of least privilege. However, they also complicate auditing and can lead to confusion about active permissions. If not managed carefully, these mechanisms may result in over-permissions and a complex permission landscape.
Nested groups and inherited permissions
Nested groups and inherited permissions create complex permission structures that can obscure actual access rights, leading to confusion and misconfigurations. Users may gain excessive permissions, increasing security risks. Auditing becomes more difficult, and changes at the parent-group level can unexpectedly affect all nested members.
Resource-based policies vs. identity-based policies
Resource-based policies can override identity-based policies by directly controlling access at the resource level, allowing actions even if identity-based policies deny them. This enables cross-account access and simplifies management but can create confusion and unexpected permissions behaviors.
Comparing effective permissions across major cloud providers
Each cloud service provider (CSP) implements a different mechanism to execute various types of permissions. Let’s look into how they stack up.
Effective permissions calculation strategies
AWS: AWS uses IAM policies and JSON documents that define the type of permissions for users and roles. Effective permissions are calculated according to identity-based and resource-based policies, leading to a potentially complex permissions landscape. (For more details, check out our article onIAM security.)
Azure: Azure employs role-based access control (RBAC), meaning roles can be assigned at different scopes (subscriptions, resource groups, etc.). Effective permissions are derived from role assignments and can be influenced by inherited permissions from higher-level scopes.
Google Cloud: Google Cloud uses IAM policies that allow for fine-grained permission settings. Effective permissions are computed based on both IAM policies and organizational policies, which can lead to unexpected permissions combinations, particularly in hierarchical resources such as folders and projects.
Unique challenges and considerations
AWS: For AWS, the challenge lies in the intricate interplay between different types of policies (identity and resource-based) and how they can conflict or overlap.
Azure: Azure's use of nested groups and role assignments can complicate permissions calculations, especially when groups are dynamically managed.
Google Cloud: The complexity of organizational policies and the ability to manage permissions at multiple levels (folders, projects) can lead to confusion in effective permissions assessments.
Examples of unexpected permissions combinations
In AWS, a user may have read access to an S3 bucket through an IAM policy but may also have access through a bucket policy, creating a scenario where permissions are unintentionally broadened.
In Azure, a user assigned a role at the resource-group level might gain access to all resources within that group, even if they were not explicitly granted permissions for specific resources.
Google Cloud's organizational policies can sometimes allow access that seems restricted to the project level, demonstrating how hierarchical permissions can lead to unexpected exposures.
Best practices for managing effective permissions
1.Implement the principle of least privilege: Implementing the principle of least privilege (PoLP) involves granting users only the permissions necessary for their tasks. Key steps include using role-based access controls, conducting regular audits to revoke excessive permissions for human and non-human identities such as service accounts, and implementing temporary credentials for elevated access. Monitoring access and training users on PoLP are also critical steps.
2. Regularly audit and review access rights: Schedule audits at consistent intervals, leverage automated tools to monitor access, and engage key stakeholders to ensure accuracy. Additionally, identify any anomalies, document changes for compliance, and establish a process to swiftly resolve issues.
3. Leverage automated tools for continuous monitoring: Automated tools can provide continuous monitoring of effective security permissions for real-time visibility into access rights, detect anomalies, and simplify audits by generating reports. They support compliance by ensuring ongoing oversight and can scale with organizational growth. Incorporating these native tools into existing security frameworks boosts overall security, streamlining access management for greater efficiency and effectiveness.
Streamlining effective permissions with CIEM
Cloud infrastructure entitlement management (CIEM) is a solution for managing effective permissions at scale, offering centralized visibility into user access across multiple cloud and developer platforms. CIEM tools provide granular insights, automate compliance monitoring, and help mitigate risks by identifying excessive permissions. Additionally, they integrate with existing security systems, enhancing overall security and streamlining access management in complex environments.
CIEM solutions provide two major benefits:
Visibility into complex permission structures: CIEM tools enhance visibility by mapping user identities, roles, and permissions across cloud environments. They provide granular insights into effective permissions, real-time monitoring of changes, and intuitive dashboards for easy comprehension. Automated reporting highlights permissions anomalies and aids in audits, while contextual analysis identifies potential risks.
Identification and remediation of excessive permissions: CIEM tools help identify and remediate excessive permissions through automated permissions analysis and risk scoring, which highlight unnecessary access rights. After detecting anomalies in access patterns, CIEM solutions provide actionable remediation recommendations, integrating with identity management systems for streamlined adjustments. And by maintaining an audit trail and generating reports, CIEM facilitates compliance and accountability, ultimately supporting the principle of least privilege and enhancing security.
Wiz’s CIEM solution helps you implement effective permissions by conducting a comprehensive analysis of cloud identities and their entitlements.
Look to Wiz for:
Visibility: Wiz’s all-in-one platform provides a granular view of all cloud identities, including users, groups, service accounts, and roles. This allows security teams to inspect the entire identity stack and detect lateral movements.
Effective permissions calculation: Wiz determines the actual permissions each identity has on all resources in an environment and displays this information at a glance, helping security teams understand the scope of sensitive data exposure.
High or admin privileges detection: By identifying and detecting highly privileged or administrator permissions granted to principals or workloads in the environment, Wiz puts a stop to threat actors.
And when it comes to multi-cloud environments, Wiz has you covered by standardizing different cloud providers into a single IAM model, which includes principals, resources, permissions, and IAM bindings. The result is easy and effective security from a single pane of glass for all cloud platforms.
Ready to see how Wiz can empower you to take control of complex permissions? Schedule a demo today.
Take Control of Your Cloud Entitlements
Learn why CISOs at the fastest growing companies secure their cloud environments with Wiz.
Application detection and response (ADR) is an approach to application security that centers on identifying and mitigating threats at the application layer.
Secure coding is the practice of developing software that is resistant to security vulnerabilities by applying security best practices, techniques, and tools early in development.
Secure SDLC (SSDLC) is a framework for enhancing software security by integrating security designs, tools, and processes across the entire development lifecycle.
DAST, or dynamic application security testing, is a testing approach that involves testing an application for different runtime vulnerabilities that come up only when the application is fully functional.
Defense in depth (DiD)—also known as layered defense—is a cybersecurity strategy that aims to safeguard data, networks, systems, and IT assets by using multiple layers of security controls.